Apologies are just that - admission of wrong doing. They’ve got even more weight amongst us when they’re backed with not one but two favors. Aidan acted appropriately and came and spoke to me, offering them. I accepted them. The issue is now behind us, yet you wish to use it to angle for your own objective.
I find it ironic that you’re saying my actions are inexcusable for banning someone from my establishment until apologies occurred after being seriously insulted, while you raise up the neutrality of Mr Johnson. This being the man that bashed a Nosferatus head in with roller skates in front of all of us into torpor, never to be seen again and forced blood bonded another, after making them both crawl and beg for mercy. Over what? An insult. And yes, you had left the city when it occurred, but the events of which were well documented in the Book for your reading pleasure when you returned.
The reality of democracy is that it does not always meet your exact expectations. It didn’t for me with some of our recent votes, but you don’t see me throwing accusations and being contrary for the hell of it, like a spastic tantrum.
If you wanted help concerning the Herald, you can ask for it an pay. Again, Aidan said he would speak with them. We all agreed to that. Just because it’s not your desired outcome doesn’t mean it’s wrong or “dismissed.”